⚠ This blog post was created with the help of AI tools. Yes, I used a bit of magic from language models to organize my thoughts and automate the boring parts, but the geeky fun and the đŸ€– in C# are 100% mine.

Hi!

So, I was reading some .NET stuff on the internet, and somehow I went back to my .NET WinForms days — when processes would get blocked all together, and we needed to find a way to isolate them so we didn’t block the main thread. Those days I learned about .ConfigureAwait(), and it’s kind of cool (and funny) to see that even in 2025 it’s still a topic.

👉 Important: if you need to stop reading here and really learn, check Stephen Toub’s post: there is EVERYTHINKG you need to know about this.

A trip to my own repo đŸ•”ïžâ€â™‚ïž

I started this by searching my own blog repo for .ConfigureAwait — and guess what? I found some old posts from 2015, back when I was playing with a Visual Studio Add-In to apply some cool refactoring features.

Of course, I didn’t want the add-in to block my IDE! So yeah, that’s how I ended up sprinkling .ConfigureAwait(false) in my samples. Fast forward to today, and this little keyword is still hanging around in 2025 discussions.

A digital illustration of async programming in .NET. The design shows glowing neon lines splitting into two paths — one leading back into a stylized window frame labeled “async,” and the other continuing forward to the word “await.” The background is deep indigo with subtle coding symbols like C# brackets { }, giving a futuristic and techy look.

Why it mattered back then

Back in the .NET Framework days, .ConfigureAwait(false) was a lifesaver to avoid deadlocks or weird performance hits, because async calls would try to jump back into the original SynchronizationContext (WinForms/WPF were my choice those days, I know I’m old).

Nowadays (.NET 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 … ), the story changed. ASP.NET Core doesn’t even have a synchronization context, so for most server-side scenarios .ConfigureAwait(false) is just noise.

For the young ones, this is how we used to do this:

private async void Button_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
    // Runs on the UI thread
    var content = await GetContentAsync();

    // Continuation runs on UI thread, safe to update UI
    label1.Text = content;
}

private async Task<string> GetContentAsync()
{
    using var client = new HttpClient();
    return await client.GetStringAsync("https://dot.net")
                       .ConfigureAwait(false); 
    // Without this, it would hop back to the UI thread unnecessarily
}

When should you still care?

So, if you are wondering where this still makes sense, Copilot helped me to get the top 3 scenarios

  • If you’re building libraries that could run in UI apps (WinForms, WPF, Blazor WebAssembly).
  • If you need fine control over continuations (perf tuning, avoiding rare deadlocks).
  • If you’re targeting mixed environments where sync contexts still exist.

And hey, this really makes sense! And, if you ever find yourself debugging an old library or building something for UI apps — you’ll be glad this little keyword is still in your toolbox.


Happy coding!

Greetings

El Bruno

More posts in my blog ElBruno.com.

More info in https://beacons.ai/elbruno


2 responses to “Does .ConfigureAwait Still Matter in .NET? đŸ€””

  1. No conocĂ­a esto del .ConfigureAwait (hace ya mucho que dejĂ© por completo la programaciĂłn), pero me ha hecho acordarme de lo viejo que soy… DoEvents de Visual Basic… Supongo que no es lo mismo, pero me ha recordado a eso.

    Veo que tĂș sigues dando caña en el mundillo, me alegro por ello.

    Un abrazo, mĂĄquina.

    Like

    1. Es cierto, creo que alguna vez vi o use el DoEvents!
      Que tiempos 😀

      Like

Leave a reply to Jorge Cancel reply

Discover more from El Bruno

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading